In my last post, I wrote about how Harvard University was trying to censor Eric Clopper for his intactivist show “Sex & Circumcision: An American Love Story.” It turns out that what they’re actually doing is far worse.
It would be one thing if the university administration merely fired him and told him to look elsewhere for a job because they were “offended” or whatever bullshit reason they could come up with.
Instead, Eric Clopper reveals on his GoFundMe page that not only did Harvard’s student news paper The Crimson publish 5 libelous articles against him, they refused to publish his letter to the editor.
Harvard suspended Clopper for 2 months for a supposed “investigation,” during which they solicited claims against him and eliminated his position.
And, as if that weren’t enough, Harvard colluded with the sound company that handled Clopper’s show to obtain intimate footage of his, which they then showed to senior administrators, his boss, his friends and colleagues.
This is a screen shot from a video College Humor did on circumcision.
Actually, Eric Clopper uses the video in his show.
Actually, Eric Clopper uses the video in his show.
In essence, Harvard University, The Crimson and Baystate Sound engaged in a smear campaign against Clopper.
Obviously his show pinched some nerves, and now people are trying to shut him down.
This is no different than if people were trying to porn-shame women who performed in the Vagina Monologues.
Clopper effectively, conclusively and irrefutably destroys the lie that male infant circumcision before an audience.
He highlights the historical reasons circumcision was performed on males, a lot of which are beliefs still held today.
He takes apart the pseudo-science used to prop up the claim that circumcision has "medical benefits"
He exposes the AAP and the so-called "circumcision task-force" for the frauds they are, and for the crock of deliberate lies they try and feed the public.
He attacks the conflict of interests that Jewish doctors and physicians have when propping up the so-called "medical benefits."
He rejects the Jewish covenant imposed on him as an infant and openly repudiates it.
This man's presentation is an indictment of American medicine and America as a whole for holding on to, repeating, and perpetuating a lie which is clear and obvious to anyone well-versed in basic human anatomy, history and medicine, basically the rest of the English-speaking world.
It is a call to action that we reject this lie for truth, and to protect the most basic, the most fundamental human rights of the next generation.
I recon this does not sit will with the AAP, Jewish members of Harvard, and gentiles who are circumcised themselves, spouses of circumcised men, or parents of circumcised children, who do not want to have to question this, who fear the spread of Eric Clopper's message.
His message is solid.
So solid and irrefutable, that the only chance people who want to silence him have is to attack his character and plague him with financial ruin and shame.
You can shoot the messenger, but the message stands or falls on its own.
I beseech my readers to please help this man with whatever you can.
Help him win his fight against those who are trying to shame him into silence.
Watch and help spread his video.
Male infant circumcision is a crime against humanity.
It is a violation of the most basic of human rights.
It is scientific profanity and an insult to human intelligence.
It is a sick, disgusting, bold-faced lie respected medical organizations in the rest of the world can see right through, and it's about time American medical organizations stop telling it.
Links to Eric Clopper's webpage, his video and his GoFundMe page can be found at the bottom of this post.
Related Links:
Eliyahu Ungar-Sargon waxes negative on Eric Clopper's performance but could use some knowledgeable criticism himself on his characterization of Freedman and the Task Force as well as other matters. See more here: https://www.eliungar.com/circumcision/2018/8/8/on-eric-clopper-and-misdirected-anger
ReplyDeleteIntactivists can't seem to agree on anything... my respect to Eli because he is one of the most prominent Jewish voices in our movement, because he published what is probably the first documentary on the matter, and for wearing tefillin in solidarity against the AAP.
DeleteStill, I feel there might be some internal conflict here; some hesitance or reluctance to acknowledge the elephant mohel in the room.
Few people have the bravery to come out and say it, but although there are many factors contributing to the perpetuation of the practice of forcibly cutting the genitals of healthy, non-consenting minors in the United States, the fact is one of the greater contributing factors is Jewish doctors and "researchers" with a conviction to protecting what is quite possibly their most contested religious ritual in key positions influencing or directly writing "studies" and public health policy based on them. The one person who I know has said it and has gotten away with was Dr. Dean Edell on one of his shows. Now he can do this because he's Jewish, but I haven't heard anyone else dare.
The very lie that circumcision "might prevent HIV" was invented by Aaron J. Fink. Jewish "researchers" like Moses and Halperin ran with it and wouldn't stop until it culminated in "evidence" to promote male infant circumcision in the US. And who else would do it but Susan Blank, Andrew Freedman and now deceased Edgar Schoen? The AAP was itself already beginning to join medical organizations in the rest of the world saying male infant circumcision isn't medically necessary, and Edgar Schoen made it his life's calling to change that.
If it makes me anti-Semitic for saying this, then so be it, but quite possibly the only real reason male infant circumcision continues in this country is because Andrew Freedman, Susan Blank and Edgar Schoen in the AAP and Thomas Frieden in the CDC have been busy making sure the most important ritual to "their tribe" is sanctioned and protected in the name of "medicine." Other "researchers" like Moses, Halperin, Leibowitz and other churn out "research," their men and women at the AAP and CDC write public policy.
That's not to say it's "just Jews" doing this; circumcision has become entrenched in American culture, so half the "researchers" and AAP circumcision contributors are also non-Jewish gentiles who are part of that culture. 1.3 million babies are circumcised a year, and when hospitals charge $2,000 in hospital fees, it's easy to see why even gentile doctors want to see male infant circumcision protected.
I say Clopper is on the money. He has the bravery to call it like it is. He's also Jewish himself, which is why it's difficult to criticize him for it. He knows he himself being Jewish gives him a certain level of license to do this. I would have imagined non-intactivist Jews trying to dismiss him as an "anti-semite," but not one of our own, like Eli.
Call a spade a spade; protecting religious rituals under the guise of medicine is a problem. We need neutral, objective, dispassionate doctors writing public health policy. There needs to be a wall between church and state. A similar wall between church, dare I say synagogue, and medicine needs to be there also.
Eli may disagree, but I commend Clopper for having the gonads to say what he did. Somebody needed to say it.